Belgium Pilot · Volume 1 · 2026 · Source dataset
The dataset the Commission is building by 2029.
Available now.
758 verified EU grant recipients in Belgium – NGOs and not-for-profits. Four official public registries, cross-referenced for the first time. Every figure sourced.
No EU institution has disputed a single data point.
The Belgium Pilot produced two distinct analytical products. One maps 758 verified NGOs and non-profits at macro level. The other goes inside a single entity’s accounts, governance, and HR cost structure.
01
Breadth Instrument
Belgium Pilot Intelligence Pack
“Which of the 758 entities show structural accountability gaps? What does the public record confirm at portfolio level?”
Price: From EUR 790
02
Depth Instrument
NGO Transparency Entity Profile
“What does the full public record show about this specific entity: accounts, governance, HR cost structure?”
The Due Diligence Journey
The Intelligence Pack is the map. The entity profile is the evidence.
2
Verify: Entity Profile
It is the evidence file – delivers everything the seven public registries confirm about that organisation.
Commission a deep-dive profile on entities, get the full fiscal analysis, HR cost structure, and governance record from seven registries: actual annual account figures | how labour costs are classified | who sits on the board and since when
11 Entity Profiles — Published · Free · Public
What the methodology produces at entity level
New profiles by commission only
Contracted amount
🟠 HR mainly in "services" (public accounts)
1-4 employees
13
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Complete & Simplified
Transparency score
MED (3-5)
Contracted amount
🟠 HR mainly in "services" (public accounts)
5-9 employees
20
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Simplified
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
Contracted amount
🟢 HR mostly on payroll (public accounts)
1-4 employees
5
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Simplified & Micro
Transparency score
MED (3-5)
🇧🇪
Contracted amount
⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)
1-4 employees
10
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
BE0875218033
Contracted amount
🟠 HR mainly in "services" (public accounts)
1-4 employees
8
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Simplified & Micro & NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
BE0687994274
Contracted amount
⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)
1-4 employees
16
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
BE0818127395
Contracted amount
⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)
(!) NOT registered as an employer
8
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Simplified & NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
BE0408310216
Contracted amount
🟢 HR mostly on payroll (public accounts)
10-19 employees
7
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Simplified
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
BE0686623804
Contracted amount
⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)
(!) NOT registered as an employer
30
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
Complete & Simplified
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
Contracted amount
⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)
(!) NOT registered as an employer
44
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
🇧🇪
Contracted amount
⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)
(!) NOT registered as an employer
3
Max. parallel grants
Annual accounts:
NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS
Transparency score
LOW (0-2)
Power fearless independent journalism
Keep institutions honest: your support means more pressure on those who think they’re untouchable, more investigations, more evidence.
Scaling the methodology · EU-27
Belgium is the pilot.
The architecture is European.
The same four-registry cross-referencing methodology — FTS against national legal identity, employer registration, and financial disclosure registries — applies to every EU member state. €54.45 billion in total EU grants to non-profits across the EU-27. The Belgium pilot proves the method works. Each country is a new volume.
If you are an institution, regulator, parliamentary committee, or newsroom that needs this methodology applied to your country — contact us.
Contact: trace@money-monitor.eu