Belgium Pilot · Volume 1 · 2026 · Source dataset

The dataset the Commission is building by 2029.

Available now.

758 verified EU grant recipients in Belgium – NGOs and not-for-profits. Four official public registries, cross-referenced for the first time. Every figure sourced.
No EU institution has disputed a single data point.

The Belgium Pilot produced two distinct analytical products. One maps 758 verified NGOs and non-profits at macro level. The other goes inside a single entity’s accounts, governance, and HR cost structure.

01

Breadth Instrument

Belgium Pilot Intelligence Pack

“Which of the 758 entities show structural accountability gaps? What does the public record confirm at portfolio level?”

Registries: 4 official public registries
Coverage: 758 verified legal entities · 92.41% of FTS total
Identification: legal form, VAT, employer registration, disclosure type, grant total, parallel load, transparency score
Format: Excel dataset + PDF analytical report
Inside: 14 charts with underlying data · Full FOIA documentation · Citable with attribution
Fiscal analysis: Disclosure quality flagged · not analysed line by line
Governance: Not included
 

Price: From EUR 790

02

Depth Instrument

NGO Transparency Entity Profile

“What does the full public record show about this specific entity: accounts, governance, HR cost structure?”

Registries: 7 official public registries
Coverage: One specific entity · deep verification
Fiscal analysis: Year-by-year accounts · actual figures · Code 61 breakdown
HR structure: Payroll % vs Code 61 % 
Workforce: EU grant funding per reported FTE, computed annually
Governance: Board members · mandate dates · tenure from public records
 

Price: EUR 500 – 1,500 per profile

The Due Diligence Journey

The Intelligence Pack is the map. The entity profile is the evidence.

1

Identify: Intelligence Pack

Tells you where to look, which of 758 NGOs and non-profits carries structural accountability signals.

Screen the 758-entity dataset. Apply your criteria (funding scale, employer registration status, transparency score, parallel grant load). Generate a shortlist.

2

Verify: Entity Profile

It is the evidence file – delivers everything the seven public registries confirm about that organisation.

Commission a deep-dive profile on entities, get the full fiscal analysis, HR cost structure, and governance record from seven registries: actual annual account figures | how labour costs are classified | who sits on the board and since when

11 Entity Profiles — Published · Free · Public

What the methodology produces at entity level
New profiles by commission only

Contracted amount

0

🟠 HR mainly in "services" (public accounts)

1-4 employees

13

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Complete & Simplified

Transparency score

MED (3-5)

Contracted amount

0

🟠 HR mainly in "services" (public accounts)

5-9 employees

20

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Simplified

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Contracted amount

0

🟢 HR mostly on payroll (public accounts)

1-4 employees

5

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Simplified & Micro

Transparency score

MED (3-5)

Contracted amount

0

⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)

1-4 employees

10

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

🇧🇪

Contracted amount

0

🟠 HR mainly in "services" (public accounts)

1-4 employees

8

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Simplified & Micro & NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Contracted amount

0

⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)

1-4 employees

16

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Contracted amount

0

⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)

(!) NOT registered as an employer

8

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Simplified & NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Contracted amount

0

🟢 HR mostly on payroll (public accounts)

10-19 employees

7

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Simplified

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

🇧🇪

Contracted amount

0

⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)

(!) NOT registered as an employer

30

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

Complete & Simplified

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Contracted amount

0

⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)

(!) NOT registered as an employer

44

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Contracted amount

0

⛔ HR in the dark (public record too thin)

(!) NOT registered as an employer

3

Max. parallel grants

Annual accounts:

NO ANNUAL ACCOUNTS

Transparency score

LOW (0-2)

Power fearless independent journalism

Keep institutions honest: your support means more pressure on those who think they’re untouchable, more investigations, more evidence.

Name your amount

Scaling the methodology · EU-27

Belgium is the pilot.
The architecture is European.

The same four-registry cross-referencing methodology — FTS against national legal identity, employer registration, and financial disclosure registries — applies to every EU member state. €54.45 billion in total EU grants to non-profits across the EU-27. The Belgium pilot proves the method works. Each country is a new volume.

If you are an institution, regulator, parliamentary committee, or newsroom that needs this methodology applied to your country — contact us.

Contact: trace@money-monitor.eu 

BE

BELGIUM

2,507 name strings· 758 entities · €7.29B · 92.41%

DE

GERMANY

2,239 name strings · €12.32B

Planned

FR

FRANCE

2,702 name strings · €5.54B

Planned

NL

NETHERLANDS

1,654 name strings · €4.91B

Planned

EU Money Monitor Embargo Agreement Form